Feed aggregator

Snapd 2.14.2 Snappy Daemon Released to Ubuntu 16.04 LTS and Fedora 24 (COPR)

TuxMachines - Tue, 2016-09-13 10:43

One day after announcing the availability of the first Beta images of the forthcoming Ubuntu Snappy Core 16 operating system for IoT and embedded devices, Canonical's Michael Vogt informed us about the release of the Snapd 2.14.2 Snappy daemon.

Snapd is the brain behind the Snappy technologies used for installing and running Snap universal binary packages in Ubuntu Linux and other GNU/Linux distributions that support it, and Snapd 2.14.2 is currently the most stable and advanced version, available now for Ubuntu 16.04 LTS (Xenial Xerus) and Fedora 24 (in the COPR repos).

Also: Canonical Releases Snapcraft 2.16 Snappy Creator Tool for Ubuntu 16.04 LTS

These Are the New Default Wallpapers of Ubuntu GNOME 16.10 (Yakkety Yak)

read more

Let's Encrypt Aiming to Encrypt the Web

LXer - Tue, 2016-09-13 10:05
VIDEO: Josh Aas, executive director of the Internet Security Research Group, discusses Let's Encrypt's mission and the technology that enables it.

Two critical bugs and more malicious apps make for a bad week for Android

LXer - Tue, 2016-09-13 09:08
The vulnerabilities, which are similar in severity to the Stagefright family of bugs disclosed last year, have been fixed in updates Google began distributing Tuesday. A large percentage of Android phones, however, aren't eligible to receive the fixes. Even those that do qualify don't receive them immediately (the September updates are currently not available as over-the-air downloads for either of the Nexus 5X devices in my household). That gives attackers crude blueprints for exploiting vulnerabilities that remain unpatched on millions of devices.

OpenDayLight Boron Set to Stabilize Open-Source SDN

LXer - Tue, 2016-09-13 08:11
The open-source OpenDayLight Software Defined Networking (SDN) project is set to debut its fifth release this week, code named Boron. The Boron release follows the Beryllium update which debuted in February.

Solus Stands on Its Own

LinuxToday - Tue, 2016-09-13 08:00

 FreedomPenguin: If you've used Solus at all in the past couple of months you have probably noticed a deluge of changes and bug fixes.

Linus Torvalds reveals his favorite programming laptop

LXer - Tue, 2016-09-13 07:14
It[he]#039[/he]s the Dell XPS 13 Developer Editon, here[he]#039[/he]s why.

I can't be the first person to try this with LVM.

Reddit - Tue, 2016-09-13 07:08

The Logical Volume Manager can create virtual block devices that refer to specific parts of other block devices, right? I got curious what happens if you were to create a virtual block device that refers to itself. So I decided to give it a try.

First, I did ls -l /dev/dm* to find the highest-numbered LVM device; dm-2 was the last one, with major:minor 254:2. I figured that the next one would most likely be 254:3. I typed dmsetup create circular, meaning to create a virtual block device with the identifier circular. I entered 0 1 linear 254:3 0 for the table.

What happened was kind of interesting. I hit Ctrl+D to tell it I was done inputting, but nothing happened. I tried pressing it a few more times, still nothing. So I hit Ctrl+C to exit and did it again. This time Ctrl+D worked, but it gave me a "device or resource busy" error.

Apparently one of those times the command actually did complete successfully, however. Because I soon noticed my system freeze completely, with the mouse cursor not working. A while later I noticed the cursor moved a little bit, so I knew the system wasn't completely frozen. I hit Ctrl+Alt+F1 to switch to a TTY so I could figure out what was going on. The screen turned black, but the login prompt didn't appear. Shortly after, I noticed a blinking light on my laptop. It was the caps lock light. Kernel panic, I'm guessing a stack overflow.

I rebooted and looked at /var/log/syslog. There was no mention of a kernel panic (I looked it up and apparently these aren't logged because writing to the file system in that situation would be risky) but I did see a line saying that "'devices/virtual/block/dm-3' is taking a long time", and a few lines higher I saw the unnecessarily-evil-sounding "Out of memory: kill process 12164 (firefox) score 10 or sacrifice child". (The message was from a daemon, so I can't say I'm surprised.)

Has anyone else ever tried this, or am I the first?

EDIT: Just came across this message. Looks like someone else had tried the same thing via a similar method.

submitted by /u/flarn2006
[link] [comments]


Subscribe to LinuxInsight aggregator